夜上海论坛社区

Yokedge crossed Chamberlain: The three twin kings of the giant

Nikolai jokich gave out 79 three pairs in the 535th career, becoming the center with the most three pairs in history.

The previous record of the center’s three pairs was Chamberlain’s 1045 games and 78 three pairs.

Of course, the three pairs of jokiki and Chamberlain came differently.

Yokedge averaged 18 shots, 6 free throws and 27.1 points in the last season, the sixth in NBA, and the real hit rate was 66% of the horror. Quality and quantity are guaranteed. It is better to invest more.

He is a two-time MVP, and the ball is in his hand again. How to play it.

However, so far this season, yokedge has scored 20 points per 12 shots, with a real hit rate of 69%, but the Nuggets are the third place in shooting.

— 14 shots per game for Murray who just returned, and 13 shots per game for PROTONIC who just returned.

— Yokiki ranked first in the league with an average of 99 touches per game, with an average of 2.7 seconds per touch, which is not as good as beendo of the grizzly bear; The league ranked first with an average of 77 passes per game, and the league ranked fifth with an average of 9.2 assists per game.

In his 77 passes, he just picked out 10 shots to give himself a score and so on, which must be not difficult, but he didn’t do that.

Many touching balls, many passing balls, no sticking balls, no throwing.

I just want to pass the ball to my teammates-and I like to pass it either for assists.

I don’t care about the data so much, and it is floating and suddenly, my career is 79 three pairs.

So this season, yokedge basically won’t have three consecutive MVPs-he doesn’t seem to be interested in it himself. Two MVPs in their own team, the right to fire self-recognition of the third?

Last case: 2006-07 season, Nash of the sun.

We all know that it may be Nash’s best season-but he didn’t have MVP in the end.

Some people really don’t want to do this.

In turn, Chamberlain.

As we all know, Chamberlain likes to brush a record and then a record.

His 78 three pairs, 53 of which were concentrated in 1966-1968.

Seven scoring Kings in the first seven years of his career, but no champion; In 1966, he listened to the advice of Philadelphia vulture coach Hannam, gave up scoring Kings and changed them to crazy brush assists. As a result, 1967 brought the Celtics dynasty to an end eight consecutive, he led the team to the finals and defeated the old club Warriors to win the championship: in that year, Rick Barry of the Warriors won the scoring king that Chamberlain gave up, but Chamberlain won the championship.

But he fell in love with brush assists again, so from 1967 to 68, Chamberlain had 702 assists in a single season, ranking first in NBA, and even had a single double 20 +.

After being a little obsessed in this aspect, his sticky balls in the left waist increased significantly in those two seasons.

Off-topic: Grandpa winter observed the days of Chamberlain and bucks in Philadelphia. He thought it was very interesting for the center to take the ball as the shaft in the waist and came up with a triangle attack…… This is the last word.

At that time, Chamberlain was not only fond of data brushing, but also fond of specialization. How many sisters were there off the court and so on, just one thing: he played for 76 people in Philadelphia at that time, but he often missed training-because he had a house in New York and often played games in Philadelphia, I went back to New York to have fun instead of playing with my teammates.

In 1968, Philadelphia led the Celts 3 to 1, and was reversed by the Celts.

In 1969, Chamberlain went to Los Angeles, leading the Celtics 2-0 in the finals and was plot twist by Russell.

Well…… It seems that it is useless to just brush assists……

Originally, Chamberlain could brush many more three pairs, which made it more difficult for yokedge to catch up.

But by the season 1971-72, Chamberlain gave up brushing data.

In that year, although he, in the words of coach Bill Sharman, played away, “everyone finished training in the morning and went to the hotel to wake up Chamberlain”, Chamberlain chose to be a blue collar in the season:

He scored 15 points, 19 rebounds and 4 assists in 9 shots on average-Ten years ago, he scored 50 points in 17 free throws per 40 shots-but played defense seriously.

West, who just took the scoring King two years ago, changed to the assistant King. The team’s first attacker was Goodrich, the left hand. Baylor retired halfway.

In this way, you pushed me, and everyone didn’t care much about the data. Under the atmosphere, the Lakers won an unprecedented 33 consecutive victories, 69 wins recorded in the regular season, and finally defeated the Knicks to win the championship.

In the West, the Chamberlain force carried the first man and the stag at that time.

In the finals, he swallowed rebounds in the New York penalty area and won the second championship in his career.

After winning the championship, Los Angeles media said Chamberlain finally took off the hat “quitter.

In season 1971-72, Chamberlain had 0 three pairs in a single season and 9 shots per game-four years ago, he had 31 three pairs in a single season, ten years ago, he scored 50 points in 40 shots-but in the end, he won 69 in the regular season of his Lakers, including 33 consecutive wins and winning the championship, and he won the MVP in the finals.

In the decisive battle, he took 24 points and 29 rebounds with his injured wrist, the second championship in his career, and the well-deserved MVP of the finals.

At the age of 35, Chamberlain finally gave up his obsession with data and became a big winner.

How to say it? Still that sentence:

Although there is such a thing as Willows and willows in the world, the best result of most cases is to seek benevolence.

If you care about data, you may get good data-but it is not easy to want other data.

If you care about winning, you will have to make sacrifices, and you will have a high probability of winning-but the data will inevitably be affected.

Seek benevolence.

It is much more difficult to think about not only the need but also the need.

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *